GENDER HYBRIDIZATIONS AND SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS IN FICTION AND NON-FICTION FILMMAKING

Main Article Content

Galo Vásconez Merino
Antonella Carpio Arias

Abstract

Introduction: The current presence of hybridity between documentary and fiction filmmaking has taken many senses, with disparate results, which have the purpose of delivering works that provide new looks on reality, which is understood as an entity represented through images. Methodology: The objective of this research is to analyze four films of hybrid fiction and documentary narration, in order to determine the elements used to create significant and unusual cinematographic experiences. A film analysis is carried out with four categories of analysis: fictional elements, documentary style, temporal manipulation and interaction with the viewer. Results: Four hybrid fiction/documentary films were analyzed. Elements such as dramatized situations and narrative tones that mix fiction and reality to question truth and lies were identified. It was observed that temporal manipulation and interaction with the viewer are crucial to create meaningful cinematic experiences. Discussion: The fusion of genres allows for new ways of representing and questioning reality. The films studied show how fiction can enrich documentary, providing an additional layer of meaning and reflection. Conclusions: The hybridization of genres in film offers a powerful tool to explore and represent reality in an innovative way, challenging traditional boundaries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vásconez Merino, Galo, and Antonella Carpio Arias. 2024. “GENDER HYBRIDIZATIONS AND SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS IN FICTION AND NON-FICTION FILMMAKING”. Revista De Comunicación De La SEECI 57 (August):1-23. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2024.57.e883.
Section
Digital storytelling in the consumer society
Author Biographies

Galo Vásconez Merino, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo

Professor of Communication at the Univeristy of Chimborazo, in the city of Riobamba-Ecuador. D. in Audiovisual Communication, Advertising and Public Relations from the Complutense University of Madrid. Master in Audiovisual Communication from the Catholic University of Argentina and Master in Audiovisual Script Creation from the International University of La Rioja. Bachelor's degree in Social Communication, with a major in television production. Audiovisual producer specialized in documentaries. Researcher in film topics, especially on black comedy, science fiction and postmodernism. He has published several scientific articles in Latin American communication magazines and edited book chapters.

Antonella Carpio Arias, Instituto Superior Tecnológico José Ortega y Gasset

Professor of Social Communication at the State University of Amazonia and Marketing at the José Ortega y Gasset Higher Institute of Technology. PhD candidate in Audiovisual Communication, Advertising and Public Relations at the Complutense University of Madrid. Master in Integrated Advertising from the International University of La Rioja. Technologist in Visual Arts. Degree in Social Communication. She has worked in the areas of Public Relations and institutional communication. She is an audiovisual researcher, expert in television series and advertising, subjects in which she has published several articles in regional indexed magazines.

References

Adam, R. y Cannan, R. (Directores). (2016). The Lovers & the Despot [Película]. Tigerlily Films; Magnolia Pictures.

Alicino, L. (2023). Poéticas de lo ‘sin ficción’. El giro documental en la narrativa mexicana contemporánea entre crónica, periodismo y narración. Orillas Rivista D'ispanistica, 12, 205-228. https://www.orillas.net/orillas/index.php/orillas/article/view/520

Arias, J. C. (2010). Las nuevas fronteras del cine documental: la producción de lo real en la época de la imagen omnipresente. Aisthesis, 48, 48-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-71812010000200004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-71812010000200004

Bazin, A. (1966). ¿Qué es el cine? Editorial Rialp.

Bordwell, D. y Thompson, K. (1995). El arte cinematográfico. Paidós.

Branigan, E. (2013). Narrative comprehension and film. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315003108

Brown, M., O’Leary, M. J. y Joshi, H. (2023). Film ethnography and critical consciousness: exploring a community-based action research methodology for Freirean transformation. Visual Studies, 39(3), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2022.2161410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2022.2161410

Bruzzi, S. (2000). New documentary: a critical introduction. Routledge.

Corbetta, P. (2007). Metodología y técnicas de investigación social. McGraw-Hill.

Felici, J. M. (2008). Avatares de la mirada: estrategias enunciativas del cine documental español contemporáneo. Hispanic Research Journal, 9(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1179/174582008X272851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/174582008X272851

Feria-Sánchez, J. J. (2023). El cine de no ficción en Andalucía: revisión y análisis de la producción contemporánea de largometrajes cinematográficos documentales (2018-2022). Revista Mediterránea De Comunicación, 14(2), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.24497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.24497

García-Martínez, A. N. (2004). En las fronteras de la no-ficción. El falso documental (definición y mecanismos). En J. Latorre Izquierdo, A. Vara Miguel y M. Díaz Méndez (Coords.), Ecología de la televisión: tecnologías, contenidos y desafíos empresariales: actas del XVIII Congreso Internacional de Comunicación (pp. 135-144). Universidad de Navarra.

Glaser, B. y Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

González, M. J. (2023). Tipologías no narrativas: el modelo hermético-metafórico y la cinematografía de atracciones unidos por la experiencia estética. L'Atalante. Revista de estudios cinematográficos, 35, 19-32. https://revistaatalante.com/index.php/atalante/article/view/1007

Greene, R. (Director). (2016). Kate Plays Christine [Película]. 4th Row Films; Faliro House; House of Nod.

Grierson, J. (1966). Grierson on Documentary. University of California Press.

Juhasz, A. (2006). Introduction: Phony Definitions and Troubling Taxonomies of the Fake Documentary. En A. Juhasz y J. Lerner (Coords.), F is For Phony: Fake Documentary and Truth’s Undoing (pp. 1-33). Minnesota University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctttsntj

Laffond, J. C. R. y Jiménez, V. M. (2010). Información, documental y ficción histórica: lecturas televisivas sobre la muerte de Franco. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 11(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636201003787642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14636201003787642

Layton, B. (Director). (2018). American Animals [Película]. Film4 Productions, RAW; Eagle Films.

Liberia Vayá, I. H. (2022). Joaquim Jordà y el documental de creación: fragmentación narrativa, hibridación realidad-ficción y conciencia de la representación en la construcción del relato. COMUNICACIÓN. Revista Internacional de Comunicación Audiovisual, Publicidad y Estudios Culturales, 1(10), 371-386. https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/Comunicacion/article/view/21637

Maitland, K. (Director). (2016). Tower [Película]. Meredith Vieira Productions; Go-Valley; Killer Impact.

Martínez-Cano, F. J., Ivars-Nicolás, B. y Roselló-Tormo, E. (2020). Cine memoria. Intersecciones entre documental y ficción en la práctica cinematográfica latinoamericana contemporánea: estudio de caso de Roma. Fotocinema: revista científica de cine y fotografía, 20, 111-136. https://doi.org/10.24310/Fotocinema.2020.v0i20.7594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/Fotocinema.2020.v0i20.7594

Metz, C. (2001). El significante imaginario: psicoanálisis y cine. Paidós.

Mínguez Arranz, N. (2014). Más allá del marco referencial. Ficción y no ficción en la cultura audiovisual digital. En G. Orozco, J. M. Aguado, C. Feijoo y I. Martínez (Eds.), La publicidad ante el reto digital (pp. 125-135). Fundación Telefónica.

Mututa, A. S. (2024). Epistemology of the Ethnographic Image: Hybridizing Genre in South Sudan’s Autobiographical Cinema. Visual Anthropology, 37(3), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2024.2334192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2024.2334192

Niang, S. (2017). Fiction and Documentary African Films: Narrative and Stylistic Affinities. Critical Interventions, 11(3), 228-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/19301944.2017.1401377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19301944.2017.1401377

Nichols, B. (1997). La representación de la realidad: cuestiones y conceptos sobre el documental. Paidós.

Orellana, J. (2003). La falsa frontera entre ficción y realidad en el cine: Una interpretación epistemológica del realismo de André Bazin y Andréi Tarkovski. Cine es realidad. https://bit.ly/30qQaMx

Plantinga, C. (2005). What a Documentary Is, After All. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 63(2), 105-117. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3700465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00188.x

Redondo-Olmedilla, J. C. (2019). Historia y ficción en la narrativa latinoamericana: la Trilogía del siglo XX, de Jorge Volpi. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research, 25(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2019.1684545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2019.1684545

Renov, M. (2012). Theorizing documentary. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873083

Sánchez Castro, M. I. (2011). ¿Verdad o mentira?: la frontera imaginaria entre la ficción y el documental. En M. T. Sauret Guerrero (Ed.), Cine español: arte, industria y patrimonio cultural (pp. 237-248). Instituto de la Cinematografía y de las Artes Audiovisuales.

Stoddart, H. (2024). Realism, Postmodernism, and Authenticity in the Contemporary Circus Novel. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2024.2371960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2024.2371960

Weinrichter, A. (2004). Desvíos de lo real: el cine de no ficción. T & B Editores.