EXPLORING TRENDS AND TACTICS OF CONTROL ON THE INTERNET: A GLOBAL ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL MEDIA BLOCKING AND CENSORSHIP

Main Article Content

Manuel Antonio Conde

Abstract

Introduction: The research was conducted to examine the control practices implemented by various entities and governments in the online realm. The aim was to understand how these actions affected freedom of expression, access to information, and online privacy. Methodology: The research involved a comprehensive review of literature and specialized sources in the field of internet censorship. Databases and specialized search engines were utilized, applying specific search terms to gather relevant data on censorship in particular countries and social media platforms. Additionally, a meticulous search was conducted in major European media outlets to corroborate and expand the collected information. Results: The research findings revealed a variety of internet control and censorship practices, including website blocking, content filtering, mass surveillance, and restrictions on access to information. Common patterns were identified across different regions of the world, alongside significant differences in strategies employed by various actors, such as governments, private companies, and lobbying groups. Conclusions: internet control and censorship pose a significant threat to digital rights and freedom of expression online. While some measures may be justified in the name of national security or user protection, many of these practices lack transparency, are arbitrary, and can be used to suppress dissent and critical thinking.Traducción al inglés del resumen en español. Escrito en Tahoma 12, justificado.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Conde, Manuel Antonio. 2024. “EXPLORING TRENDS AND TACTICS OF CONTROL ON THE INTERNET: A GLOBAL ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL MEDIA BLOCKING AND CENSORSHIP”. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI 57 (May):1-19. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2024.57.e870.
Section
Research article
Author Biography

Manuel Antonio Conde, University of Huelva

PhD in Communication and professor of the Master's Degree in Educational Technology and Digital
Competences at the International University of La Rioja and the Master's Degree in Teacher Training
for Compulsory Secondary Education and Baccalaureate, Vocational Training and Language Teaching at
the Nebrija University. Graduate in Social Education from the University of Huelva. He holds a Master's
Degree in Communication and Audiovisual Education from the Universities of Huelva and the
International University of Andalusia. His main lines of research are communication, new media, media
literacy and digital competence. Technical Advisor in Microcomputing in the Digital Agency of the Junta
de Andalucía as in Information Technology and Telecommunications.

References

Agencias Seúl. (2022). Un ciberataque deja sin Internet a Corea del Norte. La Vanguardia. https://acortar.link/1OQqBV

Águila Cheang, R. A. (2023). Irán y la represión gubernamental en la era digital: análisis comparativo de las protestas populares de 2009 y 2019. Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad, 18(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.6497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.6497

Akgül, M. y Kırlıdoğ, M. (2015). Internet censorship in Turkey. Internet Policy Review, 4(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14763 / 2015.2.366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2015.2.366

Aldous, V. (2015). Censorship in Cuba. University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound. https://bit.ly/2HnuMT7

Balkin, J. M. (2004). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. NYU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.470842

Bamman, D., O'Connor, B. y Smith, N. (2012). Censorship and deletion practices in Chinese social media. First Monday, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i3.3943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i3.3943

Bañuelos, J. (2009). YouTube como plataforma de la sociedad del espectáculo. Razón y palabra, 14(66).

BBC (2018). El intento frustrado de Rusia para bloquear Telegram que dejó inactivas 18 millones de IPs de Google y Amazon. BBC News Mundo. https://acortar.link/kVjRW0

BBC (2019). Irán: cómo un gobierno dejó sin Internet a un país de 80 millones de personas en medio de protestas y denuncias muertes de decenas de manifestantes. BBC News Mundo. https://acortar.link/NpH20V

Bell, M. (2010). WikiLeaks left off Twitter trends? The Washington Post. https://goo.gl/VJCtFQ

Blanco, J. M. (2017). Radiografía de las redes sociales en el mundo árabe: entre el auge y el bloqueo. El Confidencial. https://acortar.link/W34jBK

Butler, D. (2014, Abril 10). Turkey keeps YouTube block despite court rulings. Reuters. https://reut.rs/2uV0cqd

Chernavina, K. (2017). English guide to posting on Weibo. HI-Com https://goo.gl/dk3yAZ

Chiu, C., Ip, C. y Silverman, A. (2012). Understanding social media in China. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 78-81.

Chodownik, M. (2024). 'Día de la Libertad' bielorrusa: Así es el periodismo en el exilio que huye de la censura. Euronews. https://acortar.link/v3FkGu

Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books.

CNN (2009, marzo 26). YouTube blocked in China. CNN. https://cnn.it/2xni6XH

Colombo, M. (2023). Cómo es la realidad de conectarse a Internet en Corea del Norte. Infobae. https://acortar.link/UAF2Ws

Crampton, T. (2007). Europe: Turkey: YouTube blocked over content found offensive. World Business Briefing. https://nyti.ms/3jsV7wj

Cuesta, J. (2022). Rusia bloquea medios extranjeros y redes sociales con una nueva ley que castiga con cárcel “la desinformación”. El País. https://acortar.link/pQpxaa

Deibert, R. J. (2008). Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering. The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7617.001.0001

Deibert, R. J. (2013). Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet. Signal.

Di-Florio, A., Verde, N. V., Villani, A., Vitali, D. y Mancini, L. V. (2014). Bypassing censorship: A proven tool against the recent Internet censorship in Turkey. IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, 389-394. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2014.93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2014.93

Dingledine, R., Mathewson, N. y Syverson, P. (2004). Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium. https://cutt.ly/9w9DdhZj DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA465464

Douek, E. (2020). Speech Police: The Global Struggle to Govern the Internet. Cambridge University Press.

El Mundo (2009). Vietnam ordena bloquear Facebook para acallar a la disidencia. El Mundo. https://acortar.link/ygXAUG

Eugenia, L. (2010, december 6). Twitter appears to censor WikiLeaks-related trends. CSnews. https://goo.gl/vks1Wu

Euronews. (2023). ¿Qué países han prohibido TikTok y por qué? Euronews https://lc.cx/Bb9PjB

Europa Press (2011). Uno de cada 3 internautas del mundo no puede navegar con libertad por la censura. Portal TIC. https://acortar.link/njQhv1

Europa Press. (2023). Así es el nuevo uso de Twitter: bloqueos y limitaciones para los usuarios que no pagan. Portal TIC. https://n9.cl/zoybv

Fernández, M. (2019). Más de 17.000 canales de YouTube eliminados por las nuevas políticas contra el odio. El Español. https://acortar.link/RYf6s4

Funk, A., Shahbaz, A. y Vesteinsson, K. (2023). The Repressive Power of Artificial Intelligence. Freedom House. https://acortar.link/xt7kgQ

Furuo-Fu. (2018, noviembre 27). Lista actualizada de sitios web bloqueados en China. Sapore Di Cina. https://goo.gl/VPtMpH

Gao, Q., Abel, F., Houben, G. y Yu, Y. (2012). A comparative study of users’ microblogging behavior on sina Weibo and Twitter. International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_8

Garton-Ash, T. (2003). Free Speech: Ten Principles for a Connected World. Yale University Press.

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029

Goldsmith, J. y Wu, T. (2006). Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195152661.001.0001

Gonzalo, M. (2022). Los bloqueos de redes sociales por parte de gobiernos han afectado a 250 millones de personas en 2021. Neutral. https://acortar.link/IRny3g

Guimón, P. (2020). Trump anuncia que prohibirá el uso de TikTok en Estados Unidos. El País. https://lc.cx/pl59zT

Harwit, E. (2017). WeChat: Social and political development of China’s dominant messaging app. Chinese Journal of Communication, 10(3), 312-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1213757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1213757

Harwit, E. y Clark, D. (2001). Shaping the Internet in China. Evolution of political control over network infrastructure and content. Asian Survey, 41(3), 377-408. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2001.41.3.377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2001.41.3.377

Helft, M. (2009). YouTube blocked in China, google says. The New York Times. https://nyti.ms/2XBy1fq

Howard, P. N. y Hussain, M. M. (2011). The upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0041

Huffington Post. (2020, enero 23). Twitter responde a Vox que si quiere recuperar su cuenta solo tiene que borrar el "tuit ofensivo". Huffington Post. http://bit.ly/36GklRi

Hunter, P. (2008). Pakistan YouTube block exposes fundamental Internet security weakness: Concern that Pakistani action affected YouTube access elsewhere in world. Computer Fraud & Security, 2008(4), 10-11. https://acortar.link/aNB2Uk DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(08)70065-4

Infobae. (2014, marzo 29). Estos son los países que bloquean Facebook, Twitter y YouTube. Infobae. https://goo.gl/uYvLjf

Junquera, N. (2023). Arabia Saudí, Kuwait, Emiratos... y Santa Cruz de Bezana. El País. https://acortar.link/1tW6Vb

Kantar Media CIC. (2018). China social media landscape 2018. https://goo.gl/5r3VQQ

Keller, D. (2019). Scale and state power: Facebook’s regulation of political speech. Columbia Law Review, 119(1), 139-202.

Kenyon, A. P. (2018). The Anatomy of Censorship in the Digital Age: The Case of Bahrain. Routledge.

Kippel (2017). El Gobierno de Arabia Saudí controlará y censurará las llamadas de WhatsApp y Skype. Kippel. https://acortar.link/CdKsfp

Klonick, K. (2018). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1598-1673.

Kumar, R. (2021). Las “cibertropas” de Vietnam: así acosa el régimen a sus críticos en redes sociales. El Diario. https://acortar.link/61iSZd

Li, C., Liu, J. y Ouyang, S. (2016). Analysis and prediction of content popularity for online video service: A Youku case study. China Communications, 13(12), 216-233. https://doi.org/10.1109/CC.2016.7897546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CC.2016.7897546

Lien, C. H. y Cao, Y. (2014). Examining WeChat users’ motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from China. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016 / j.chb.2014.08.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.013

MacKinnon, R. (2012). Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle For Internet Freedom. Basic Books.

Mena, M. (2022). Más de 70 países han bloqueado o restringido el acceso a redes sociales desde 2015. Statista. https://acortar.link/BY3mAU

Monroy, M. (2024). Sitios web bloqueados en China: Lista 2024. LTL. https://cutt.ly/Jw9DbK0N

Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. PublicAffairs.

Murphhy, D. (2011, January 25). Inspired by Tunisia, Egypt’s protests appear unprecedented. The Christian Science Monitor. https://goo.gl/MDUUgh

Netblocks. (2019). Social media outage and disruptions in Venezuela amid incident in Caracas. Netblocks. https://bit.ly/2U8igry

O'Neill, R. (1991) The plausible myth of learner-centredness: or the importance of doing ordinary things well. ELT Journal, 45(4), 293-304, https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/45.4.293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/45.4.293

Pérez-Colomé, J. (2020, enero 22). Twitter limita la cuenta de Vox por “incitación al odio”. El País. http://bit.ly/2SbB2Pc

Poitras, L. (2014). Citizenfour [Documentary Film]. Praxis Films.

Público (2024). El Congreso de EEUU aprueba un proyecto de ley para prohibir TikTok en el país. Público. https://lc.cx/EmR24e

Qiu, L., Lin, H. y Leung, A. K. (2013). Cultural differences and switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) social networking site. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111434597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111434597

Rosen, J. (2008, noviembre 28). Google’s gatekeepers. The New York Times. https://goo.gl/RB2EWW

Roth, A. (2018). Moscow court bans Telegram messaging app. The Guardian. https://acortar.link/lbV4eQ

Sahuquillo, M. R. (2019). Rusia aprueba la ley que refuerza su capacidad de censura en Internet. El País. https://acortar.link/Ctbow0

Saxena, D. (2019). China’s Facebook and other social media platform alternatives. H2S Media http://bit.ly/2O9gIN9

Simon, J. (2014). The New Censorship: Inside the Global Battle for Media Freedom. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231160643.001.0001

Soengas-Pérez, X. (2013). The role of the Internet and social networks in the arab uprisings an alternative to official press censorship. [El papel de Internet y de las redes sociales en las revueltas árabes: una alternativa a la censura de la prensa oficial]. Comunicar, 41, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-14

Soto, R. y Bonilla, P. (2023). Qué es RuNet, el Internet de Rusia que podría desconectar a su población de la red global. Neutral. https://acortar.link/7sZNWi

Sullivan, J. (2014). China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New Media & Society, 16(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472966

Tanash, R. S., Chen, Z., Thakur, T., Wallach, D. S. y Subramanian, D. (2015). Known unknowns: An analysis of Twitter censorship in Turkey. En Proceedings of the 14th ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (pp. 11-20). https://doi.org/10.1145/2808138.2808147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2808138.2808147

Tech In Asia. (2019). Youku. https://goo.gl/CxC8Ya

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.

Villamuera, J. (2023). ¿Qué son las empresas BATX? El orden Mundial. https://acortar.link/zGQZO9

Villeneuve, N. (2008). The Ghostnet Paradox. Cambridge University Press.

Xisi-Dai. (2018). Las redes sociales en China. Human Level. https://goo.gl/6GeBPz

Xu, J., Kang, Q., Song, Z. y Clarke, C. P. (2015). Applications of mobile social media: WeChat among academic libraries in China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 21-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.012

York, J. C. (2012). A Primer on Internet Freedom: How Governments Can Stop Online Speech. Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Zuckerman, E. (2013). Rewire: Digital Cosmopolitans in the Age of Connection. W. W. Norton & Company.

Artículos relacionados

Abuín-Penas, J. y Abuín-Penas, R. (2022). Redes sociales y el interés por la información oficial en tiempos de pandemia: análisis de la comunicación de los ministerios de salud europeos en Facebook durante la COVID-19. Revista de Comunicación y Salud, 12. https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2022.12.e303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2022.12.e303

Rivera Otero, J. M., Lagares Diez, N., Pereira López, M. y Jaráiz Gulías, E. (2021). Relación entre diversos usos de las redes sociales, emociones y voto en España. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 79, 73-98. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1518

Hernandez-Serrano, M. J., Renés-Arellano, P., Campos Ortuño, R. y González-Larrea, B. (2021). Privacidad en redes sociales: análisis de los riesgos de auto-representación digital de adolescentes españoles. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 79, 133-154. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1528

Nuevo-López, A., López-Martínez, F. y Delgado-Peña, J. J. (2023). Bulos, redes sociales, derechos, seguridad y salud pública: dos casos de estudio relacionados. Revista de Ciencias de la Comunicación e Información, 28, 120-147. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2023.28.e286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2023.28.e286

Mdleleni, L. y Velapi, L. (2022). Can Social Innovation advance the PMTCT programme? A South African reflection. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 7(1), 43-56. https://pub.sinnergiak.org/esir/article/view/165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.22-1.4