Examining information, consultation, and communication in Romanian Local Public Administrations within the online sphere: a case study of Constanta and Cluj-Napoca
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of information, consultation, and communication in Romanian Local Public Administrations within the Online Sphere, where digital transition supplements traditional methods and introduces new opportunities and challenges. The focus is on public engagement in online communications, especially concerning public consultation invitations from local administrations. Data from Facebook posts by the municipalities of Constanta and Cluj-Napoca was analyzed using FanPageKarma and RStudio, providing insights into public participation. The research underscores the importance of online platforms in promoting transparency, citizen engagement, and collaborative decision-making in open governance. It reveals that despite the number of public consultation posts being relatively low, they affirm the commitment to participatory governance. Interestingly, posts not explicitly inviting public consultation saw higher engagement rates, suggesting the necessity of appealing content and audience understanding. The study also found that urban planning posts had lower engagement, indicating a potential need for simpler communication strategies for technical topics. The findings highlight that while digital platforms have been used effectively for citizen engagement, there is a need for continuous improvement and adaptation to maintain transparent and inclusive governance. The research adds to our understanding of the strategies employed in digital transitions and the importance of gauging public perception of online communication.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Communication of SEECI recognizes and promotes copyright rights, as well as the need to disseminate knowledge in an accessible and equitable manner. Our journal operates under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows authors and users to:
- Share and Adapt: Copy, redistribute, and adapt the material published in the journal in any medium or format.
- Attribution: Properly acknowledge authorship and provide a link to the license, indicating if any changes have been made.
- Non-Commercial: Do not use the material for commercial purposes without the express permission of the authors and the journal.
- Authors retain copyright and may enter into non-exclusive agreements for self-archiving, deposit, or distribution of the publisher's version published in this journal, including institutional, national, or international repositories, and personal websites.
References
Acasandre, A. (2020). Public participation in the decisional process in Bucharest. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Political Sciences & European Studies, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenpses/6.1/12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenpses/6.1/12
Androniceanu, A. (2021). Transparency in public administration as a challenge for a good democratic governance. Revista Administratie Si Management Public, 36, 149-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2021.36-09
Béliveau-Côté, G., Cloutier, G., Houde-Tremblay, É. y De Rocher Chembessi, C. S. (2022). Self-organizing or organizing one another? Cycling groups’ participation to planning. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2071965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2071965
Durose, C. y Richardson, L. (2015). Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change. Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447316695.001.0001
Franceschetti, L. (2016). The Open Government Data Policy as a Strategic Use of Information to Entrench Neoliberalism? The case of Italy. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 9(2), 517-542. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v9i2p517
Hemmersam, P., Martin, N., Westvang, E., Aspen, J. y Morrison, A. (2015). Exploring urban data visualization and public participation in planning. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(4), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1073898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1073898
Horgan, D. (2022). Devolution of decision-making: Tools and technologies towards equitable place-based participation in planning. Sustainable Development Dimensions and Urban Agglomeration, 121. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102555
Ivars-Baidal, J. A., Celdrán-Bernabeu, M. A., Femenia-Serra, F., Perles-Ribes, J. F. y Giner-Sánchez, D. (2021). Measuring the progress of smart destinations: The use of indicators as a management tool. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100531
Loewen, B., Larssæther, S., Gohari-Krangsås, S., Vinge, H. y Temeljotov-Salaj, A. (2022). Contested urban green space development: Rolling back the frontiers of sustainability in Trondheim, Norway. En Whose Green City? Contested Urban Green Spaces and Environmental Justice in Northern Europe (pp. 103-123). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04636-0_6
Matei, A. I., Antonovici, C. G. y Savulescu, C. (2016). Fostering Co-Public Marketing and Co-Production of Public Services in Romania. Acta Universitatis Danubius: Administratio, 8(2), 5-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2939506
Meirinhos, G., Bessa, M., Leal, C., Oliveira, M., Carvalho, A. y Silva, R. (2022). Reputation of Public Organizations: What Dimensions Are Crucial? Administrative Sciences, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040126
Meltzer, M., Ștefănescu, L. y Ozunu, A. (2018). Keep them engaged: Keep Them Engaged: Romanian County Inspectorates for Emergency Situations’ Facebook Usage for Disaster Risk Communication and Beyond. Sustainability, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051411
Mickoleit, A. (2014). Social media use by governments: A Policy Primer to Discuss Trends, Identify Policy Opportunities and Guide Decision Makers. OECD iLibrary. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrcmghmk0s-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrcmghmk0s-en
Nae, M., Dumitrache, L., Suditu, B. y Matei, E. (2019). Housing Activism Initiatives and Land-Use Conflicts: Pathways for Participatory Planning and Urban Sustainable Development in Bucharest City, Romania. Sustainability, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226211
Nitoslawski, S. A., Galle, N. J., Van Den Bosch, C. K. y Steenberg, J. W. (2019). Smarter ecosystems for smarter cities? A review of trends, technologies, and turning points for smart urban forestry. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101770
Pantić, M., Cilliers, J., Cimadomo, G., Montaño, F., Olufemi, O., Torres Mallma, S. y Van den Berg, J. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities for Public Participation in Urban and Regional Planning during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Lessons Learned for the Future. Land, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121379
Pereira, G. C., Rocha, M. C. F. y Poplin, A. (2012, 18-21 de junio). E-Participation: Social media and the public space. Computational Science and Its Applications. 12th International Conference, Salvador de Bahia, Brazil, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31075-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31075-1
Radu, B. (2019). The Impact of Transparency on the Citizen Participation in Decision- Making at the Municipal Level in Romania. Central European Public Administration Review, 17(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.1.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.1.06
Repette, P., Sabatini-Marques, J., Yigitcanlar, T., Sell, D. y Costa, E. (2021). The evolution of city-as-a-platform: Smart urban development governance with collective knowledge-based platform urbanism. Land, 10(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010033
Roblek, V., Strugar, I., Meško, M., Bach, M. P. y Jaković, B. (2020). E-Democracy Tools Adoption: Experience of Austria, Croatia, Italy, and Slovenia. 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), 1329-1335. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO48935.2020.9245352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO48935.2020.9245352
Rus, M., Tasente, T. y Tanase, G. (2022). The importance of the consultation process in order to implement public policies. Public consultation on enhanced cooperation against vaccine-preventable diseases. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 37(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v37i1.7657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v37i1.7657
Slave, A. R., Iojă, I.-C., Hossu, C.-A., Grădinaru, S. R., Petrișor, A.-I. y Hersperger, A. M. (2023). Assessing public opinion using self-organizing maps. Lessons from urban planning in Romania. Landscape and Urban Planning, 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104641
Stan, M.-I., Aivaz, K.-A., Vintilă, D.-F. y Ionițiu, I. (2021). Assessing the perception of stakeholders regarding the impact of coastal tourism on the environment in the Romanian Black Sea coastal area. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 8(4), 628-639. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i4.695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i4.695
Ünlü, S., Yaşar, L. y Bilici, E. (2022). Digital Public Relations Practices in Ecological Municipalism: A Study on the Ecological Municipal Capital of 2021, Lahti. Ege Academic Review, 22(4), 413-424. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1075902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1075902
Văidianu, N. y Ristea, M. (2018). Marine spatial planning in Romania: State of the art and evidence from stakeholders. Ocean & Coastal Management, 166, 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.017
Related articles
Caro Vásquez, M., Elasri Ejjaberi, A., Aparicio Chueca, P. y Triadó Ivern, X. (2021). Relación entre el engagement por uso de redes sociales y la práctica de ejercicio físico en los centros deportivos municipales de Barcelona. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 79, 223-235. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1501
Cervi, L., Tejedor Calvo, S. y Robledo-Dioses, K. (2023). Comunicación digital y ciudad: Análisis de las páginas web de las ciudades más visitadas en el mundo en la era de la COVID-19. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 81-108. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1845
Martínez Solana, Y. y Martín García, T. (2021). Análisis comparativo de la gestión gubernamental de comunicación de crisis de la COVID-19, vacas locas y atentados del 11M. Historia y Comunicación Social, 26(Especial), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.74242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.74242
Salazar-Botello, C., Ganga-Contreras, F., Uribe-Nuñez, P. y Muñoz-Jara, Y. (2020). Necesidades de capacitación en una municipalidad de la zona central de Chile: la mirada de los funcionarios. Opción, 36(92), 224-254.
Zabala-Cia, O., Lorenzo-Sola, F. y González-Pacanowski, T. (2022). Interactividad en redes sociales para crear relaciones de confianza: ayuntamientos de navarra en tránsito. Revista de Ciencias de la Comunicación e Información, 27, 23-43. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2022.27.e246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2022.27.e246