Digital Applications For Inclusion. The European Project DEPIT
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses the relevance of personalization and inclusion as key aspects of teaching planning and emphasizes the suitability of technologies to support this perspective. An app, called DEPIT (Designing for Personalization and Inclusion with Technologies), whose purpose is to support teacher planning and programming, is presented and evaluated from the perspective of the teaching staff. The information is collected from teachers regarding their attitude towards the DEPIT app, as well as its usefulness in teaching practice. The applied value of the app is collected through a discussion forum. The quantitative analysis of the data carried out by means of the statistical program SPSS v.24, identifies positive attitudes of the teaching staff in relation to the use of digital tools to elaborate the teaching programming. The qualitative analysis, carried out through the software Atlas.ti v.8, records aspects that teachers value in the application of DEPIT, among others: “Its adaptation and versatility to diverse educational contexts”, “It facilitates interaction and communication” and “It promotes freedom, independence and autonomy”.The results allow us to conclude that teachers assume a proactive and positive attitude towards the incorporation of technological tools for their teaching and put in value the potential of the DEPIT App for teacher programming.
Downloads
Article Details
The Journal of Communication of SEECI recognizes and promotes copyright rights, as well as the need to disseminate knowledge in an accessible and equitable manner. Our journal operates under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows authors and users to:
- Share and Adapt: Copy, redistribute, and adapt the material published in the journal in any medium or format.
- Attribution: Properly acknowledge authorship and provide a link to the license, indicating if any changes have been made.
- Non-Commercial: Do not use the material for commercial purposes without the express permission of the authors and the journal.
- Authors retain copyright and may enter into non-exclusive agreements for self-archiving, deposit, or distribution of the publisher's version published in this journal, including institutional, national, or international repositories, and personal websites.
References
Bauman, Z. (2018). Generación líquida: Transformaciones en la era 3.0. Barcelona: Editorial Planeta.
Berthoz, A. (2011). Simplexité. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Bosada, M. (2018). El reto de personalizar el aprendizaje con ayuda de las TIC, Educaweb. Recuperado de https://www.educaweb.com/noticia/2018/05/31/reto-personalizar-aprendizaje-ayuda-tic-18489/
Caminal, A. y Puigcerver, M. (2017). Diseños de campus virtual: descripción de la oferta actual en la enseñanza de las ciencias experimentales y su influencia en el uso por parte del alumnado universitario, Diddacticae, (2), 119-133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1344/did.2017.2.119-133
Cubeles, A. & Riu, D. (2018). The effective integration of ICTs in universities: the role of knowledge and academic experience of professors, Technology, Pedagogy
and Education, 27(3), 339-349.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1457978
De Pablos, J.; Colás, P.; López, A. & García, I. (2019). Uses of digital platforms in Higher Education from the perspectives of the educational research, REDU. Revista de
Docencia Universitaria, 17(1), 59-72.
doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2019.11177
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi.
Fernández, I. (2017). Mejora de competencias: Introducción de la gestión de
calidad en nuevas metodologías educativas, Revista de Currículum y
Formación del Profesorado, 21(2), 279-308. Recuperado de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/59461/36173
Gámiz, V. y Gallego, M. J. (2016). Modelo de análisis de metodologías didácticas semipresenciales en Educación Superior, Educación XX1, 19(1), 39-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.15577
Grande, P. y González, M. M. (2015). La educación inclusiva en la educación infantil: propuestas basadas en la evidencia. Tendencias Pedagógicas, (26), 145-162. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5247176.pdf
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as design science. New York: Routdledge.
Laurillard, D. et al. (2011). A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 15-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00458.x
Molano, E. G.; Sánchez, O. N. y Castillo, J. N. (2012). Aprendizaje con modelo TCPK y e-learning de la lógica de programación, Revista vínculos, 9(2), 57-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.14483/2322939X.4287
Onrubia, J. (2016). Aprender y enseñar en entornos virtuales: actitud conjunta, ayuda pedagógica y construcción del conocimiento, RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 50(3), 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/3
Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos (OEI). Inclusión Educativa. Recuperado de https://oei.cl/inclusion-educativa/inclusion-educativa
Pineda, P. y Castañeda, A. (2013). Comunicación dialógica y ciberparlamentos españoles, Sphera Pública, junio, 44-63. Recuperado de: http://sphera.ucam.edu/index.php/sphera-01/article/view/197/168
Siu, K. W. & Lam, M. S. (2012). Public computer assisted learning facilities for children with visual impairment: Universal design for inclusive learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(5), 295-303.
Touron, J. (2019). Aprendizaje personalizado y tecnología. [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de https://www.javiertouron.es/aprendizaje-personalizado-tecnologia/
UNESCO (2016). Educación 2030: Declaración de Incheon y Marco de Acción para la realización del Objetivo de Desarrollo Sostenible 4. Recuperado de https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656_spa