Concepts to understand organizational innovation
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper exposes four aspects that must be considered in the study of organizational structure of the modern organization: the firm as a socio-economic unit, functionality, innovation and competitiveness. This is to say: re-organize it under real efficiency criteria, not priorizing un-productive executive cadres over mid-cadres needed in order to develop effective activity and a viable expansion Project, not only on paper but in practice too. An organization designe for the global benefit of the company and its associates, able to react and to make long-term plans, resulting in a solid and reliable economic institution able to produce profits for longer periods of time. The thematic is taken from a dynamic point of view, integrating these four elements in a theoretical construct that provides solid basis of organizational structure theory that promotes the firm performance in aspects such as competitiveness and innovation. At this point, emerges a very interesting debate, about cause-effect interaction among competitiveness and innovation, inscribing this theoretical issue as one of the most important contributions from this investigation on a field of study that based most of its principles on complementary suppositions, exogenous variables and circumstantial relativities to explain just one phenomenon: the organization.
Downloads
Article Details
The Journal of Communication of SEECI recognizes and promotes copyright rights, as well as the need to disseminate knowledge in an accessible and equitable manner. Our journal operates under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows authors and users to:
- Share and Adapt: Copy, redistribute, and adapt the material published in the journal in any medium or format.
- Attribution: Properly acknowledge authorship and provide a link to the license, indicating if any changes have been made.
- Non-Commercial: Do not use the material for commercial purposes without the express permission of the authors and the journal.
- Authors retain copyright and may enter into non-exclusive agreements for self-archiving, deposit, or distribution of the publisher's version published in this journal, including institutional, national, or international repositories, and personal websites.
References
Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and Environments. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Arie, L., Long, C., Caroll, T. (1999). The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 5(10), 535-550.
Baligh, H. (1994). Components of Culture: Nature, Interconections, and Relevance to the Decisions on the Organization Structure. Management Science, 1, (40), 14-27.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1(17), 99-120.
Barney, J., Hensen, M. (1994). Trustworthiness as a Source Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal. Special Issue, 15, 175-190.
Barrios, D. (2009). Diseño Organizacional Bajo un Enfoque Sistémico para Unidades Empresariales Agroindustriales. Tesis de maestría. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Bate, P., Khan, R., Pye, A. (2000). Towards a Culturally Sensitive Approach to Organization Structuring: Where Organization Design Meets Organization Development. Organization Science, 2(11), 197-211.
Bethel, J. Porter, J. (1998). Diversification and the Legal Organization of the Firm. Organization Science, 1(9), 49-67.
Collins English Dictionary (2009). Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Recuperado de http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/enterprise
Danneels, E. (2002). The Dynamics of Product Innovations and Firm Competences. Strategic Management Journal, 12(23), 1095-1121.
Davis, G. y Marquis, C. (2005). Prospects for Organization Theory in the Early-Twentieth-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms. Organization Science, 4(16), 332-343.
Dean, J., Joon Yoon, S., Susman, G. (1992). Advanced Manufacturing Technology and Organizational Structure: Empowerment of Subordination. Organization Science, 2(3), 203-229.
Etzioni, A. (1975). A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. New York: Free Press.
Evan, W., Black, G. (1967). Innovation in Business Organizations: Some Factors Associated with Success or Failure of Staff Proposals. The Journal of Business 4(40), 519-530.
Láscaris, T. (2002). Estructura Organizacional para la Innovación Tecnológica. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación, 3, Mayo-Agosto.
March, J., Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Mata, F., Fuerst, L., Barney, J. (1995). Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 4(19), 487-505.
Mintzberg, H. (1971). Managerial Work: Analysis from observation. Management Science, 2(18), B97-B110.
Mintzberg, H. (1978). The Structuring Organizations: A Synthesis of Research. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’s: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design. Management Science, 3(26), 322-341.
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995).The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ouchi, W. (1979). A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms. Management Science, 9(25), 833-848.
Peteraf, M. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-19
Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Free Press: New York.
Powell, T. (1992). Organizational Alignment as Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 2(13), pp. 119-134.
Powell, T. (2001). Competitive Advantage: Logical and Philosophical considerations. Strategic Management Science, 9(22), 875-888.
Rico y Fernández (2002). Diseño de las organizaciones como proceso simbólico. Psicothema, 14(2), 415-125.
Rindova, V., Fombrun, C. (1999). Constructing Competitive Advantage: The Role of Firm-Cunstituent Interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 8(20), 691-710.
Romme, A. (2003). Making a Difference: Organization as a Design. Organization Science, 5(14), 558-573.
Simon, H. (1991). Organizations and Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(5), 25-44.
Smetes, M., Morris, T. y Greenwood, R. (2012). From Practice to Field: A Multilevel Model of Practice-Driven Institutional Change. Academy of Management Journal, 4(25), 877-904.
Stabell, C., Fjelstad, D. (1998). Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage: On Chains, Shops and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 5(19), 413-437.
Swanson, E. (1994). Information Systems Innovations among Organizations. Management Science, 9(40), 1069-1092.
Teece, D., Pisano, G. y Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533
Walker, G., Madsen, T., Carini, G. (2002). How does Institutional Change Affect Heterogeneity among Firms?. Strategic Management Journal 2(23), 89-104.
Weber, M. (1968). Economía y sociedad. Esbozo de sociología comprensiva. Trad. J. Medina Echavarría. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Weiss, R. (2000). Taking Science Out of Organization Science: How would Postmodernist Reconstruct the Analysis of Organizations. Organization Science. 6(11), 709-731.