Contributions to Knowledge from Interstitial Areas. Gender and not Recognized Epistemologies
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Methodological proposals related to the generation of new knowledge have been considered at least the last thirty years. That variables are not always served by traditional academia; for example one that comes from the sociocultural practice and from various researchers as Estelle Barrett (2010) -knowledge located in the personality Brad Haseman (2006) – perfomative research- or who contributed Elliott Eisner in 1981 when he presented his Decalogue on the contributions of the arts in education over scientific methods, as they focus more on the creation of meaning, not to discover the truth.
Moreover, the focus of research from feminist epistemology has changed from a general truth to the objectivity situated (Haraway 2004; Braidotti, 2009; De Lauretis, 2004), which permeates the specific context and temporality and spatiality of the phenomenon under investigation. Methodological criteria consider the “position” of the researcher (Denzin and Lincoln) when his results are presented (Aguirre-Calleja, 2012).
Downloads
Article Details
The Journal of Communication of SEECI recognizes and promotes copyright rights, as well as the need to disseminate knowledge in an accessible and equitable manner. Our journal operates under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows authors and users to:
- Share and Adapt: Copy, redistribute, and adapt the material published in the journal in any medium or format.
- Attribution: Properly acknowledge authorship and provide a link to the license, indicating if any changes have been made.
- Non-Commercial: Do not use the material for commercial purposes without the express permission of the authors and the journal.
- Authors retain copyright and may enter into non-exclusive agreements for self-archiving, deposit, or distribution of the publisher's version published in this journal, including institutional, national, or international repositories, and personal websites.
References
ABRIC, J. (2001): Prácticas sociales y representaciones. México D.F: Edic Coyoacán.
AGUIRRE-CALLEJA, A. (2012): “La figuración creando mundos habitables. Una tecnología feminista de otras prácticas”. En: LIEVANO M. & DUQUE M. (2012) Subjetivación femenina: Investigación, estrategias y dispositivos críticos. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. México.
AZOR, I. (2004): Teatralidades y carnaval. Danzantes y color en Puebla de los Ángeles. Irvine: Gestos.
BARRETT, E. & B. BOLT. (2010): Practice as Research: Aproaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. New York: I. B. Taurus.
BLAZQUEZ, N. (2001): El retorno de las brujas. Incorporación y aportaciones de las mujeres a la ciencia. Universidad Autónoma de México. Centro de investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades. (10 diciembre) Disponible en http://computo.ceiich.unam.mx/webceiich/docs/libro/El%20retorno%20de%20las%20brujas.pdf
BRAIDOTTI, R. (2009): “Subjectivity. How can we think in nomadic terms?” Conferencia pronunciada en el Seminario Ideas recibidas. Un vocabulari per la cultura artística contemporània (1 de diciembre). Disponible en http://www.macba.cat/es/rosi-braidotti.
BUTLER, J. (2002): Cuerpos que importan, sobre los límites materiales y discursivos del sexo. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
CRENSHAW, K. (2004): 'Intersectionality: The Double Bind of Race and Gender.” Perspectives Magazine, 2004, p.2 http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/perspectives_magazine/women_perspectives_Spring2004CrenshawPSP.authcheckdam.pdf
CRENSHAW, K. (1989): “Demarginalizing the intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics”. HeinOnline. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 139-168 (11 diciembre 2014). Disponible en: http://philpapers.org/archive/CREDTI.pdf
CONQUERGOOD, D. (Summer 2002): “Performance Studies: Interventions and Radical Research”. Theatre Drama Review. Vol 46. N° 2, 145-156.
DE LAURETIS, T. (2007): Figures of Resistance. Essays in Feminist Theory. Illinois: Chicago Press.
DENZIN, N. K. & LINCOLN, Y. (2011): The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. California: Sage.
EISNER, E.W. (2004): El arte y la creación de la mente. Barcelona: Paidós.
FRAYN, M. (2007): Copenhague. Disponible en http://www.temakel.com/teatrocopenhague.htm
HARAWAY, D. (1995): Conocimientos situados: La cuestión científica en el feminismo y el privilegio de la perspectiva parcial. En HARAWAY, D., Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres. La reinvención de la naturaleza (313-345). Madrid: Cátedra.
HARAWAY, D. (2004) [1997]): Testigo_Modesto@Segundo_Milenio. HombreHembra©_Conoce_Oncoratón®: Feminismo y tecnociencia. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
HARDING, S. (2004): “Rethinking standpoint Epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’?” En: HARDING, S. (ed.).The feminist standpoint theory reader. Intellectual and political controversies. Nueva York: Routledge, 127-140.
HASEMAN, B. (2006) “A Manifesto for Performative Research”. Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy, theme issue "Practice-led Research" (N° 118) 98-106. http://tech.firegreens.com/The_Global_Network_of_Science/america/mexico/udlap/teatro/mecanica_cuantica_en_la_udlap.
IBAÑEZ T. (2012 [2004]): Introducción a la Psicología Social. Editorial UOC. Barcelona.
GLĂVEANU, V. P. (2012): “Habitual Creativity: Revising Habit, Reconceptualizing Creativity”. Review of General Psychology. Vol. 16, N° 1, 78-92.
KEMBER, S. & ZILINSKA. J. (2012): Life after New Media. Mediation as a Vital Process. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.
MADISON, S. (2010): Acts of Activism Human Rights and Radical Performance. Theater and Performance theory. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
MONTERO M. & FERNANDEZ P. (2003): “Editorial”. Revista Interamericana de Psicología. 37(2), 211-213
PETERS, G. (2009): The Philosophy of Improvisation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (11 diciembre de 2014) Disponible en http://www.psicorip.org/Resumos/PerP/RIP/RIP036a0/RIP03715.pdf
PUIG DE LA BELLACASA, María (s/f) “Feminist knowledge politics in situated zones. A different hi/story of knowledge construction”. Paper. (11 diciembre 2014) Disponible en http://www.women.it/cyberarchive/files/puig.htm; http://www.women.it/quarta/workshops/epistemological4/mariapuig.htm
SPRY, T. (2011): Body, Paper, Stage: Writing and Performing Autoethnography. Left Coast Press.