David Cronenberg. “The Fly” or The Return to The Human Thing No-Human
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
From the gridiron of cinema, we can analyze the society and their integrants. Supported by the eyes of different filmmakers, we can perceive a fundamental point: how much different is the reality from the otherside of the screen?, is the viewer really sure about his ontologic condition of being? Issues that resound and pant in the film work of a specific director: David Cronenberg, in his filmography and in particular The Fly (Id. 1986) opens us the possibility to make reflections of long encouragement. If we question the notion of the philosophically "me" modern, their lining should also be questioned: their meat. We have tried to analyze the world to such a grade that more than to describe it to acquire a quasi perfectible knowledge, we have put it in the dissection iron to the way of frigid and stark meat. In a superficial sense it is thought that the New Meat postulates the human victory in the face of the death, like she already peeked Mary Shelley in its tragic Frankenstein; but not, before well, it not only seeks the coalition with all object in the space but with all moment in the time. It is a return to the mythical cronotopo: to their axis mundi.
Downloads
Article Details
The Journal of Communication of SEECI recognizes and promotes copyright rights, as well as the need to disseminate knowledge in an accessible and equitable manner. Our journal operates under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows authors and users to:
- Share and Adapt: Copy, redistribute, and adapt the material published in the journal in any medium or format.
- Attribution: Properly acknowledge authorship and provide a link to the license, indicating if any changes have been made.
- Non-Commercial: Do not use the material for commercial purposes without the express permission of the authors and the journal.
- Authors retain copyright and may enter into non-exclusive agreements for self-archiving, deposit, or distribution of the publisher's version published in this journal, including institutional, national, or international repositories, and personal websites.
References
Cuéllar, C. (2002). Nuevo sexo y nueva carne. Erotismo, pornografía y nueva carne. En A. J. Navarro (ed.), La Nueva Carne. Una estética perversa (pp. 173-198). España: Valdemar.
Duque, F. (2010). El cyborg sí tiene quien le escriba. En S. E. Proa (ed.), La escritura del cuerpo. El cuerpo de la escritura (pp. 13-27). México: UAZ.
Duque, F. (1993) La profanación técnica de dios. En F. Duque (ed.), Lo santo y lo sagrado (pp. 203-222). España: Trotta.
Duque, P. (2002). La transgresión carnal. Patrones para una evolución somática en el cine fantástico contemporáneo. En A. J. Navarro (ed.) La Nueva Carne. Una estética perversa (pp. 95-134). España: Valdemar.
Eliade, M. (1981). Lo Sagrado y lo Profano. (Trad. Luis Gil). (4ta. Edición). España: Guadarrama.
Freixas, R. (2002). David Cronenberg. La perversión de la realidad. En A. J. Navarro (ed.), La Nueva Carne. Una estética perversa (pp. 291-324). España: Valdemar.
G. Cortés, J. M. (1997). La aparición del Otro: el tema de la sombra y los gemelos (de Edgar Allan Poe a David Cronenberg). En Orden y Caos. Un estudio cultural sobre lo monstruoso en el arte (pp. 98-114). España: Anagrama.
Hormigós, M. 2002). Nuevas espacies para el panteón de lo grotesco femenino. David Cronenberg y la Nueva Carne. En A. J. Navarro (ed.), La Nueva Carne. Una estética perversa (pp. 135-172). España: Valdemar.
Pedraza, P. (2002). Teratología y Nueva Carne. En A. J. Navarro (ed.), La Nueva Carne. Una estética perversa (pp. 35-72). España: Valdemar.
Zambrano, M. (1993). El hombre y lo divino. México: FCE.