Education and Internet for Local Development
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
The Journal of Communication of SEECI recognizes and promotes copyright rights, as well as the need to disseminate knowledge in an accessible and equitable manner. Our journal operates under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows authors and users to:
- Share and Adapt: Copy, redistribute, and adapt the material published in the journal in any medium or format.
- Attribution: Properly acknowledge authorship and provide a link to the license, indicating if any changes have been made.
- Non-Commercial: Do not use the material for commercial purposes without the express permission of the authors and the journal.
- Authors retain copyright and may enter into non-exclusive agreements for self-archiving, deposit, or distribution of the publisher's version published in this journal, including institutional, national, or international repositories, and personal websites.
References
Ademola, R. (2009). Influencia de la ansiedad ante los ordenadores y el conocimiento de su uso en estudiantes de secundaria. Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 7, 1269-1288
Agarwal, R. & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a firm`s web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Information System Research. 13, 168-225
Agarwal, R. (2000). Individual acceptance of information technologies. In R. W. Zmud (Ed.) Framing the domains of it management research: glimpsing the future to the past. Pinnaflex, 85–104.
Amoako, K. & Salam, A. (2004). An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management. 41, 731-745
Ballester, R., Gil, M., Gómez, S. y Gil, B. (2010). Propiedades psicométricas de un instrumento de evaluación de la adicción al cibersexo. Psicothema. 22, 1048-1063
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 84, 191-215
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy. Mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 37, 122-147
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist. 28, 117-148
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (ed.). Encyclopedia and Human Behavior. (pp. 71-88). New York: Academic Press
Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (ed.). Self-efficacy in changing societies. (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambriedge University Press.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology. 52, 1-26
Barbeite, F. & Weiss, E. (2004). Computer self ´´efficacy and anxiety scales for a internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behaviors. 20, 1-15
Bennett, J., Zimmer, C., Gundlach, M. & McKnight, H. (2008). Internal and external dimensions of computer self–efficacy: an empirical examination. Transactions on Engineering Management. 55, 628-644
Beranuy, M., Chamarro, A., Graner, C. y Carbonell, J. (2009). Validación de dos escalas breves para evaluar la adicción a Internet y el abuso del móvil. Psicothema. 21, 480-485
Bertrand, M. & Bouchard, S. (2008). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. Journal of Cyber-Therapy & Rehabilitation. 1, 200-211
Bigne, E., Ruíz, C. & Sanz, S. (2007). Key drivers of mobile commerce adoption. An exploratory study of Spanish mobile use. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2, 48-60
Bonilla, L. y Bonilla, J. (2006). Estudio comparado de las estimaciones de dos versiones del Modelo de Aceptación de la Tecnología (TAM) mediante los programas AMOS y PLS. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa. 12, 95-110
Briñol, P., Horcajo, J., De la Corte, L., Valle, C., Gallardo, I. y Díaz, D. (2004). Efecto de la ambivalencia evaluativa sobre el cambio de actitudes. Psicothema. 16, 373-377
Busch, T. (1995). Geneder differences in self-efficacy and attitudes towards computers Journal of Educational Computers Research. 12, 147-158
Carmel, E. & Agarwal, R. (2002). The maturation of offshore sourcing of information technology work. MIS Quarterly Executive. 1, 65-77
Compeau, D. & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self efficacy: development of measure and initial test. Mis Quarterly. 19, 189-211
Chang, H. (2009). Application of the extended the Technology Acceptance Model to picture archiving and communication systems in dental hospital. Journal of Korean Informatics. 15, 265-272
Chin, W. (2009). A technology acceptance model: mediated and moderated effect. Asia Pacific Management Review. 14, 461-473
Chu, Y. (2006). Levels of computer self efficacy , computer use and earnings in China. Economics Letters. 90, 427-432
Chuo, Y-H., Tsai, C-H., Lan, Y-L. & Tsai, C-S. (2011). The effect of organizational support, self efficacy and computer anxiety on the usage intention of e–learning system in hospital. African Journal of Business Management. 5, 5518-5523
D’ambra, J. & Wilson, C. (2004). Explaining perceived performance of the world wide web; uncertainly and the Task Technology Fit Model. Internet Research. 14, 294-310
Davis F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 319-340
Davis, F. & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. Journal Computer Studies. 45, 19-45
Davis, F. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: systems, characteristics, user perception and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man Machine Studies. 8, 475-487
Davis, F. (2006). On the relationship between HCI and technology acceptance research. In P. Zhang & Galleta, D. (cords.). Human –computer interaction and management information systems: foundations. (pp. 395-401). New York: AMIS
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 35, 982-1003
Dishaw, M. & Strong, D. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task Technology Fit construct. Information & Management. 36, 9-21
Durndell, A. & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self–efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes toward Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior. 18, 521-535
Fuente, A., Herrero, J. y Gracia, E. (2010). Internet y apoyo social: sociabilidad online y ajuste psicosocial en la sociedad de la información. Acción Psicológica. 7, 9-15
García-Lirios, C. (2007). Percepción de utilidad del comercio electrónico. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 12, 409-420
García-Lirios, C. (2008). La brecha digital de las generaciones futuras. Entelequía, 8, 61-72
García-Lirios, C. (2011). Estructura de las actitudes hacia el comercio electrónico. Contribuciones a la Economía, 14, 1-10
García-Lirios, C. (2012). Estructura híbrida de los determinantes sociodemográficos del consumo electrónico. Gepu, 3, 43-53
García-Lirios, C. (2013). Actitud hacia la utilidad y el riesgo en las redes sociales. Folios, 29, 91-103
Gong, M., Xu, Y. & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education. 1, 365-375
Ha, S. & Stoel, L. (2009). Consumer e-shopping acceptance; antecedents in a Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Business Research. 62, 565-571
Hassan, Y. (2006). Factores de diseño web orientado a la satisfacción y no frustración de uso. Revista Española de Documentación Científica. 29, 239-257
Hee, D. & McDaniel, S. (2011). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model in exploring antecedents to adopting fantasy sports league websites. International Journal of Sport Marketing & Sponsorships. 240-253
Hernández, B., Jiménez, J. y De Hoyos, M. (2007). Aceptación empresarial de las Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación: un análisis del sector servicios. Revista da Gestao da Tecnologia e Sustemas de Informaçao. 4, 3-22
Hernández, C., Robles, E. y Mella, J. (2009). Medición de la actitud hacia el uso del computador e Internet en estudiantes de enseñanza media en Santiago de Chile. En J. Sánchez (Ed.) Nuevas ideas en informática educativa. (pp. 28-35). Santiago: Universidad de Chile
Herrero, A., Rodríguez, A. y Trespalacios, J. (2006). La adopción del comercio electrónico B2B: una comparación empírica de dos modelos alternativos. Revista Española de Investigación de Marketing. 10, 69-91
Hsu, M. & Chiu, C. (2004). Internet self efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems. 38, 369-381
Jiménez, J. y Martín, M. (2007). Indicadores y dimensiones que definen la actitud del consumidor hacia el uso del comercio electrónico. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa. 31, 7-31
Jonhson, D. & Warldlow, J. (2004). Computers experiences, self efficacy and knowledge of undergraduate student entering a land grant college of agriculture by year and gender. Journal of Agricultural Education. 45, 53-64
Khorrami, O. (2001). Researching computer self-efficacy. International Educational Journal. 2, 17-26
Klopping, I. & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task Technology Fit Model to Consumer e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal. 22, 35-49
Lai, V. & Lee, H. (2005). Technology acceptance model for Internet banking: an invariance analysis. Information & Management. 42, 373-386
Lee, D., Park, J. & Ahn, J. (2001). On the explanation of factors affecting e –commerce adoption. Twenty Second International Conference on Information System. Paper 14
Liang, J., & Tsai, C. (2008). Internet self-efficacy and preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments: A study of pre-school teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (1), 226-237.
Limayen, M., Hirt, S. & Cheung, C. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: the case of information systems continuance. Mis Quarterly. 31, 705-737
Liu, S., Liao, H. & Peng, C. (2005). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and flow theory to online e-learning user’s acceptance behavior. Issues in Information Systems. 2, 175-182
López, L. y López, J. (2011). Los modelos de adopción de tecnologías de información desde el paradigma actitudinal. Cadernos Ebape. 9, 176-196
Lorenzo, C., Constantinides, E., Gómez, E. y Geurts, P. (2008). Análisis del consumo virtual bajo la influencia de las dimensiones constituyentes de la experiencia web. Estudios sobre Consumo. 84, 53-65
Mafé, R. y Blas, S. (2007). Influencia del perfil sociodemográfico, relaciones con el medio y actitud ante la compra a distancia en el comportamiento de compra por televisión. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa. 13, 131-143
Martínez, J. y De Hoyos, M. (2007). Indicadores y dimensiones que definen la actitud del consumidor hacia el uso del comercio electrónico. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa. 31, 7-30
Meléndez, P. y Moreno, G. (2006). El uso de tecnologías basadas en Internet para el aprendizaje. Un estudio exploratorio en el contexto del Modelo de la Aceptación de la Tecnología. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa. 12, 217-230
Montero, Y. (2006). Factores de diseño web orientado a la satisfacción y no frustración de uso. Revista Española de Documentación Científica. 29, 239-257
Orantes, S. (2011). Viabilidad del Modelo de la Aceptación de la Tecnología en las empresas mexicanas. Una aproximación a las actitudes y percepciones de los usuarios de las tecnologías de la información. Revista Digital Universitaria. 12, 1-15
Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H. & Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self–efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrated technology in education practice. Computers & Education. 50, 1084-1091
Pin, H. (2004). Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior. Information and Management. 4, 719-729
Porter, C. & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the Technology Acceptance Model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: the role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research. 59, 999-1007
Porter, S. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine internet usage: the role perceived access barriers and demographic. Journal of Business Research. 59, 999-1007
Reed, E. & Wolniak, G. (2005). Diagnosis or determination: assessment explained through Human Capital Theory and the concept of aptitudes. Journal of Sociology. 1, 1-5
Reid, M. & Levy, Y. (2008). Integrating trust and computer self-efficacy with TAM: an empirical assessment of customers’ acceptance of banking information system. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce. 12, 1-18
Roca, J., Chiu, C. & Martínez, F. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 64, 683-696
Rose, J. & Fogarty, G. (2006). Determinants of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the technology acceptance model: senior consumer adoption of self-service banking technologies. Marketing & Management Development. 2, 122-130
Ruíz, C. y García, J. (2007). Factores determinantes de la decisión de compra en Internet. Un análisis de la formación a distancia. Estudios sobre Consumo. 80, 49-60
Ruíz, C. y Sanz, S. (2007). Influencia del perfil sociodemográfico, relaciones con el medio y actitud ante la compra a distancia en el comportamiento de compra por televisión. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa. 13, 131-143
Saadé, R. & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e–learning: the effect of computer self–efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education. 8, 1-15
Saadé, R., Nebebe, F. & Tan, W. (2007). Viability of the Tecnology Acceptance Model in multimedia learning environments: a comparative studies. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects. 3, 1-10
Sam, H., Othman, A. , & Nordin, Z. (2005). Computer Self-Efficacy, Computer Anxiety, and Attitudes toward the Internet: A Study among Undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (4), 205-219.
Sandoval, R. y Saucedo, N. (2010). Grupos de interés en las redes sociales: el caso de Hi5 y Facebook en México. Educación y Humanidades. 4, 132-142
Sanz, S., Mafé, C. y Aldás, J. (2008). La influencia de la dependencia en el comercio electrónico B2C. Propuesta de un modelo integrador aplicado a la intención de compra futura en Internet. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa.36, 45-76
Shepers, J. & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management. 47, 90-110
Shih, H. (2004). Extended Technology Acceptance Model of Internet utilization behavior. Information & Management. 41, 719-729
Shrrof, R., Denenn, C. & Ng, E. (2011). Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in examining student’s behavioral intention to use an e-portfolio system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 27, 600-618
Simsek, A. (2011). The relationships between computer anxiety and computer self efficacy. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2, 177-187
Su, L., Hsiu, L. y Cheng, P. (2005). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and flow theory to online e-learning user’s acceptance behavior. Issues in Information System. 6, 175-182
Suárez, A., García, N. y Álvarez, M. (2008). Actitud de los consumidores hacia encuestas on–line. Estudios sobre Consumo. 84, 1-17
Teh, P-L., Chong, C-W., Yong, C-C. & Yew, S-Y. (2010). Internet self–efficacy, computer self–efficacy, and cultural factor on knowledge sharing behavior. African Journal of Business Management. 4, 4086-4095
Torkzadeh, G., Cha, J. & Demirhan, D. (2006). A contingency model of computer and internet self efficacy. Information & Management. 43, 541-550
Vekiri, I. & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: perceived social support, computer self–efficacy and value beliefs, and computer beyond school. Computers & Education. 51, 1392-1404
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Mis Quarterly. 27, 425-476
Wai, W., Andersson, R. y Oslear, K. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 21, 387-395
Winocur, R. (2006). Internet en la vida cotidiana de los jóvenes. Revista Mexicana de Sociología. 68, 551-580
Wu, J., Shen, W., Lin, L., Greenes, R. & Bates, D. (2008). Testing the Technology Acceptance Model for evaluating healthcare professionals intention to use and adverse event reporting system. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 20, 123-129
Wu, Y. & Tsai, C. (2006). University students Internet attitudes and self efficacy: a study at tree universities in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 9, 441-452
Zhangxi, L., Binjia, S. y Linhua, Y. (2007). Understanding Internet banking: an empirical investigation of potential customers’ acceptance in Mailand, China. American Conference of Information System. 485, 1-14